Comparison Overview

Sainsbury's

VS

Target

Sainsbury's

33 Holborn, London, EC1N 2HT, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Over 150 years old and still going strong, we’re the UK’s second-biggest retailer. Every day, the nation shops with us because they know they’ll get affordable, good food and excellent service. We focus on great value and convenient shopping across our family of brands, from Argos, Nectar and Habitat to Sainsbury’s Bank, Smart Charge and Tu. What’s next for Sainsbury’s? We've put food back at the heart of our business and we’re taking Sainsbury’s to the next level. We’re investing in technology and people and we’re thinking bigger about how we attract and connect with our customers, while doing everything we can to create a more resilient UK food system.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 69,917
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Target

1000 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, 55403, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Target is one of the world’s most recognized brands and one of America’s leading retailers. We make Target our guests’ preferred shopping destination by offering outstanding value, inspiration, innovation and an exceptional guest experience that no other retailer can deliver. Target is committed to responsible corporate citizenship, ethical business practices, environmental stewardship and generous community support. Since 1946, we have given 5 percent of our profits back to our communities. Our goal is to work as one team to fulfill our unique brand promise to our guests, wherever and whenever they choose to shop. For more information, visit corporate.target.com. Beware of Hiring Scams: Target will never ask you to submit personal information via a text message for a position. Target will only ask you to apply for positions through corporate.target.com/careers, or Workday, our applicant tracking system.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 171,269
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sainsburys.jpeg
Sainsbury's
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/target.jpeg
Target
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sainsbury's
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Target
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sainsbury's in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

Target has 33.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Sainsbury's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sainsbury's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Target (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Target cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sainsburys.jpeg
Sainsbury's
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party Vendor Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2010
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unencrypted Emails
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/target.jpeg
Target
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Development Environment
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2013
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sainsbury's company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Target company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Target company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Sainsbury's company.

In the current year, Target company has reported more cyber incidents than Sainsbury's company.

Target company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Sainsbury's company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Target company and Sainsbury's company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Target company nor Sainsbury's company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sainsbury's company nor Target company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sainsbury's nor Target holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sainsbury's company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Target company.

Target company employs more people globally than Sainsbury's company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Sainsbury's nor Target holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sainsbury's nor Target holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sainsbury's nor Target holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sainsbury's nor Target holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sainsbury's nor Target holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sainsbury's nor Target holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.