Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SAIC VOLKSWAGENSAIC VOLKSWAGEN
VS
Freudenberg GroupFreudenberg Group
SAIC VOLKSWAGEN

SAIC VOLKSWAGEN

上海, 上海, CN, 201805

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.csvw.com
760/1000Fair

上汽大众汽车有限公司由上汽集团和大众汽车集团合资经营,公司总部位于上海安亭,并先后在南京、仪征、乌鲁木齐、宁波、长沙等地建立了生产基地。 作为国内历史最悠久的汽车合资企业之一,上汽大众率先在自主研发、技术创新等方面开展了大力探索和有益实践,不仅培养了一支高效率、高素质的开发队伍,也建立了功能完善、具备国际水平的技术开发中心。从桑塔纳的技术引进,到桑塔纳2000型和帕萨特轿车的联合开发,从桑塔纳3000型起对自主开发的探索,到New Passat新帕萨特、Lavida家族的成功研发,上汽大众走出了一条从引进吸收、联合开发到自主研发的创...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:6,739
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Freudenberg Group

Freudenberg Group

Höhnerweg 2-4, Weinheim, DE, 69469

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.freudenberg.com/
770/1000Fair

Freudenberg is a global technology group that strengthens its customers and society long-term through forward-looking innovations. Together with its partners, customers and research institutions, the Freudenberg Group develops leading-edge technologies and excellent pro...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:19,820
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SAIC VOLKSWAGEN

SAIC VOLKSWAGEN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Freudenberg Group

Freudenberg Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAIC VOLKSWAGEN in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Freudenberg Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SAIC VOLKSWAGEN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAIC VOLKSWAGEN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Freudenberg Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Freudenberg Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SAIC VOLKSWAGEN

SAIC VOLKSWAGEN

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Freudenberg Group

Freudenberg Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN and Freudenberg Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN and Freudenberg Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SAIC VOLKSWAGEN or Freudenberg Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SAIC VOLKSWAGEN or Freudenberg Group ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN and Freudenberg Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SAIC VOLKSWAGEN and Freudenberg Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3