Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc.Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc.
VS
AmilAmil
Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc.

Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc.

Mandaluyong City, PH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sddi.com.ph
765/1000Fair

Safeguard DNA Diagnostic Inc. (SDDI) is a Philippine Joint Venture company with an equal partnership with Safeguard Biosystems, formed to provide a Molecular Microbiology diagnostic laboratory delivering rapid detection and identification to primarily infectious disease...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:70
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Amil

Amil

Rua Arquiteto Olavo Redig de Campos, 105, Bloco B, São Paulo, 04711-905, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://amil.com.br
792/1000Fair

A Amil é uma empresa do setor de saúde que atua no Brasil combinando expertise e liderança para coordenar todos os agentes desse mercado - criando relações sustentáveis para conhecer e atender às necessidades de cada cliente e permitir que ele aproveite o melhor da vida...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,437
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc.

Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amil

Amil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amil in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc.

Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SAF5592955110525
Amil

Amil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. company and Amil company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. and Amil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. and Amil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. or Amil ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. or Amil ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. and Amil, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Safeguard DNA Diagnostics Inc. and Amil, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA