Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SAECOWilsonSAECOWilson
VS
WärtsiläWärtsilä
SAECOWilson

SAECOWilson

NZ

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.saecowilson.co.nz
745/1000Moderate

SAECOWilson formed through the merger in 2011 of Wilson Bros (established in 1919) and SAECOPRECISION (established 1963) and now form part of the Motion New Zealand Ltd. We specialise in the distribution of Bearings, Power Transmission and Engineering Supplies to the N...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:69
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Hiililaiturinkuja 2, Helsinki, 00180, FI

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.wartsila.com
786/1000Fair

We are a global leader in innovative technologies and services shaping the decarbonisation of marine and energy. With approximately 6.9 billion euros in sales and 18,000 employees across 78 countries, the Wärtsilä strategy focuses on helping customers to continuously im...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:16,349
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SAECOWilson

SAECOWilson

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAECOWilson in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wärtsilä in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SAECOWilson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAECOWilson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wärtsilä (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wärtsilä cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SAECOWilson

SAECOWilson

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wärtsilä

Wärtsilä

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SAECOWilson company and Wärtsilä company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SAECOWilson and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SAECOWilson and Wärtsilä, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SAECOWilson or Wärtsilä ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SAECOWilson or Wärtsilä ?
Between SAECOWilson and Wärtsilä, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SAECOWilson and Wärtsilä, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94056
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94055
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94054
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-93993
SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8