Comparison Overview
Sacoor Brothers
Sacoor Brothers
Rua Pedro Nunes 9B, Lisbon, Lisbon, 1050-169, PT
Last Update: 03/04/2026
The Sacoor Group, originating from Lisbon, Portugal since 1989 is an international premium fashion retailer whose reason for existence is to exceed its customers’ expectations every day. For over 30 years the Sacoor Group has designed timeless elegance across several ca...
Levi Strauss & Co.
1155 Battery St, None, San Francisco, California, US, None
Last Update: 04/04/2026
You’re an original. So are we. We’re a company of people who like to forge our own path. We invented the blue jean in 1873, and we reinvented khaki pants in 1986. We pioneered labor and environmental guidelines in manufacturing. And we work to build sustainability int...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Sacoor Brothers
Levi Strauss & Co.
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sacoor Brothers in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Levi Strauss & Co. in 2026.
Incident History - Sacoor Brothers (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sacoor Brothers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Levi Strauss & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Levi Strauss & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Sacoor Brothers
Levi Strauss & Co.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4 on their respective release lines, Kustomize bake operations allow unsafe YAML tag processing in rosco manifests. This can lead to remote code execution on rosco pods when performing Kustomize bakes. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4.
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/2d75818b85cc4c35144d5e5ed45e7340fcab5dfe
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/bbc30c9b9034a056e95f012fa1b34e9fd703cae7
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/de5a7a05af35aee19eb71d289cd0b77f67509009
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/df32d568e82519d9f3896fc9007baba0077c87fd
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/f5cec213f8cf207843ed5a6929395960a1ca094f
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2025.3.4
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2025.4.4
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.0.3
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.1.1
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.2.0
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/security/advisories/GHSA-p68j-q7hf-3qcp
Multiple connections to the backend using the same charging station ID are allowed, which could allow an attacker to deploy multiple instances of malicious OCPP clients to overwhelm the backend.
Previously, there was no throttling on repeated authentication attempts to the charging station backend, which could allow an attacker to execute a denial-of-service attack.
The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.
vulnerability in Drupal Commerce guest registration allows . This issue affects Commerce guest registration versions: *.*.