Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sachem Central School DistrictSachem Central School District
VS
Los Angeles Unified School DistrictLos Angeles Unified School District
Sachem Central School District

Sachem Central School District

US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.sachem.edu
841/1000Good

The Sachem Family (students, parents, employees and residents) works interdependently to develop leaders of great character who are highly competent, confident and caring. Most importantly we are motivating our students to become the best possible version of themselves.

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:999
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Los Angeles Unified School District

Los Angeles Unified School District

333 S Beaudry Ave, Los Angeles, 90017, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.lausd.net
695/1000Weak

Second largest school district in the nation, LAUSD enrolls nearly 575,000 students in kindergarten through 12th grade, at over 900 schools, and 187 public charter schools. The boundaries spread over 710 square miles and include the mega-city of Los Angeles as well as a...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:44,918
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sachem Central School District

Sachem Central School District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Los Angeles Unified School District

Los Angeles Unified School District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sachem Central School District in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Los Angeles Unified School District in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sachem Central School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sachem Central School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Los Angeles Unified School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Los Angeles Unified School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sachem Central School District

Sachem Central School District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAC104411222
Los Angeles Unified School District

Los Angeles Unified School District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOS21264224
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LOS101216922
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOS201072825

FAQ

Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sachem Central School District company and Los Angeles Unified School District company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sachem Central School District and Los Angeles Unified School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sachem Central School District and Los Angeles Unified School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sachem Central School District or Los Angeles Unified School District ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sachem Central School District or Los Angeles Unified School District ?
Between Sachem Central School District and Los Angeles Unified School District, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sachem Central School District and Los Angeles Unified School District, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1