Comparison Overview
SABON

SABON
Tel Aviv, IL
Last Update: 18/12/2025
We believe that happiness can be found in every day little moments of joy and wonder. We aspire to bring a spark of joy that illuminates every day. A spark radiates and spreads. SABON aims at disseminating joy and wonder by elevating daily moments. SABON’s world is enc...

Marks and Spencer
Waterside House, London, W2 1NW, GB
Last Update: 16/07/2026
At M&S, we're dedicated to being the most trusted retailer, prioritising quality and delivering value. Every day, we bring the magic of M&S to our customers, whenever, wherever and however they want to shop with us. For over a century, we've set the standard, doing the ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SABON







Marks and Spencer






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SABON in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Marks and Spencer has 482.52% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - SABON (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SABON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Marks and Spencer (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Marks and Spencer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SABON

Marks and Spencer
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.