Comparison Overview
Saab Australia

Saab Australia
21 Third Avenue, Mawson Lakes, SA, 5095, AU
Last Update: 08/03/2026
Saab Australia is a prime systems integrator with decades of experience delivering complex defence and civil security projects. Through our commitment to collaboration and innovation, we are constantly evolving to meet our customers capability requirements. 2023 Emplo...

BAE Systems
BAE Systems, London, SW1Y 5AD, GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
At BAE Systems, we help our customers to stay a step ahead when protecting people and national security, critical infrastructure and vital information. We provide some of the world’s most advanced, technology-led defence, aerospace and security solutions and employ a sk...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Saab Australia







BAE Systems






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Saab Australia in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BAE Systems in 2026.
Incident History - Saab Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Saab Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BAE Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BAE Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Saab Australia

BAE Systems
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.