Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

S&P Global MobilityS&P Global Mobility
VS
MizuhoMizuho
S&P Global Mobility

S&P Global Mobility

N/A

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile

S&P Global Mobility (formerly Automotive at IHS Markit) is the global leader in automotive intelligence and the industry benchmark for clients around the world. We help you make the most informed decisions to capitalize on opportunities and avoid risks because we provi...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mizuho

Mizuho

1–5–5 Otemachi, Chiyoda–ku, Tokyo, Japan, JP, 100–8176

Last Update: 09/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.mizuhogroup.com/
828/1000Good

This is not your typical financial institution. It’s our people who make us a cut above. Here, every person is respected because of their differences, not in spite of them. We pride ourselves on a culture of purpose, passion and compassion. At Mizuho, we provide the st...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,426
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
S&P Global Mobility

S&P Global Mobility

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mizuho

Mizuho

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S&P Global Mobility in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mizuho in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - S&P Global Mobility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

S&P Global Mobility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mizuho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mizuho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
S&P Global Mobility

S&P Global Mobility

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mizuho

Mizuho

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between S&P Global Mobility company and Mizuho company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between S&P Global Mobility and Mizuho, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between S&P Global Mobility and Mizuho, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - S&P Global Mobility or Mizuho ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - S&P Global Mobility or Mizuho ?
Between S&P Global Mobility and Mizuho, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between S&P Global Mobility and Mizuho, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9