Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Ryuk Labs

Ryuk Labs Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

ryuklabs.io

Ryuk Labs is a future-focused R&D-driven innovation lab operating at the intersection of Blockchain, AI, and emerging technologies. We Don't Just Ship Code. We Build Companies. We experiment, build, and scale breakthrough systems across Web3, AI, and emerging technologies, turning bold visions into market-shaping realities. At Ryuk Labs, We build decentralized infrastructure enabling scalable cross-chain applications. Bridging AI and blockchain to enable verifiable, transparent intelligence systems, Where AI-native systems meet scalable Web3 infrastructure. We Engineer the digital primitives powering tomorrow’s decentralized economy. Every experiment that leaves our lab is built to perform and thrive in the wild. Our mission is to


Ryuk Labs A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Ryuk Labs
Company Information
Website:https://ryuklabs.io
Employees number:11
Number of followers:112
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:ryuklabs.io
Ryuk Labs Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
logo
Ryuk LabsSoftware Development
Updated:
30/06/2026
547/1000
Critical
C
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Ryuk Labs Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Ryuk LabsSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Ryuk Labs
Ryuk LabsCritical
Current Score
547C (CRITICAL)
01000
4 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
555Before Incident
JULY 2026
548Before Incident
JUNE 2026
545Before Incident
MAY 2026
536Before Incident
APRIL 2026
534Before Incident
MARCH 2026
528Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
524Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
518Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
512Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
505Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
499Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
492Before Incident
JUNE 2025
636Before Incident
Ransomware
02 Jun 2025Ryuk Labs
Ryuk, TrickBot and Conti: Conti, Trickbot cybercrime group leader unmasked

Operation Endgame: Russian National Vitaly Kovalev Accused of Leading Conti and TrickBot Ransomware Operations

463After Incident
CRITICAL-173
RYUBLECON1766104409
Russian National Linked to Conti and TrickBot Ransomware Operations Identified in Global Crackdown Germany’s Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) has accused Russian national Vitaly Nikolaevich Kovalev—also known by the alias Stern—of leading the Conti and TrickBot (Wizard Spider) ransomware operations, following a wave of disruptions under Operation Endgame, an international law enforcement initiative targeting cybercrime. Investigations by the BKA revealed that Kovalev played a senior role in TrickBot, Ryuk, and Conti, with the TrickBot group at one point comprising over 100 members operating in a structured, profit-driven hierarchy. The exposure of TrickLeaks and ContiLeaks data earlier accelerated the dismantling of Conti, while authorities now seek information to aid in Kovalev’s arrest. He is believed to be residing in Russia, complicating extradition efforts. This development follows U.S. sanctions imposed on Kovalev over two years ago for his involvement in the same ransomware networks. The case underscores the ongoing challenges in prosecuting high-level cybercriminals operating from jurisdictions with limited cooperation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gain
SEPTEMBER 2024
730Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Sep 2024Ryuk Labs
RansomHub, Ryuk and Black Basta: ShadowSyndicate Leverages Server Transition Technique in Latest Ransomware Attacks

ShadowSyndicate Adopts Advanced Server Rotation Tactics to Evade Detection

607After Incident
CRITICAL-123
RYUBLAFLA1770302429
ShadowSyndicate Adopts Advanced Server Rotation Tactics to Evade Detection In February 2026, cybersecurity researchers at Group-IB uncovered a sophisticated server transition technique employed by ShadowSyndicate, a cybercrime group first identified in 2023. The threat actor has refined its infrastructure management by rotating SSH fingerprints across multiple command-and-control (C2) servers, attempting to obscure operational continuity. Despite these efforts, operational security (OPSEC) lapses such as overlapping SSH keys allowed researchers to trace connections, revealing at least 20 active C2 servers linked to attack frameworks like Cobalt Strike, Metasploit, Havoc, Mythic, and Sliver. ShadowSyndicate’s method involves transferring servers between SSH clusters to simulate legitimate ownership changes, creating plausible deniability. However, distinct patterns in SSH key usage exposed the group’s activities. Researchers confirmed two additional SSH fingerprints tied to the group in early 2026, further mapping its infrastructure. The group’s operations are closely tied to multiple ransomware campaigns, including Cl0p/Truebot, ALPHV/BlackCat, Black Basta, Ryuk, and Malsmoke, with varying degrees of confidence. During RansomHub attacks in September–October 2024, Darktrace observed data exfiltration to ShadowSyndicate-associated servers via SSH, specifically linking the IP 46.161.27[.]151 to their C2 infrastructure. Another server (179.60.149[.]222) was found hosting MeshAgent alongside a known SSH fingerprint. Analysts assess with moderate confidence that ShadowSyndicate operates as either an Initial Access Broker (IAB) or bulletproof hosting (BPH) provider, leveraging a network of private European providers with ties to Russian offshore entities. These providers disguise operations as VPN or proxy services, using layered autonomous system numbers (ASNs) like AS209588 and AS209132. The group demonstrates a consistent preference for specific hosting providers, creating predictable attribution patterns despite attempts to diversify infrastructure. Their zero-day exploitation capabilities and organization-scale resources position them as a hybrid infrastructure provider, fueling both ransomware operations and potentially state-sponsored advanced persistent threats (APTs). As of February 2026, ShadowSyndicate’s infrastructure remains active, continuing to scan for vulnerabilities and deploy malicious payloads.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
RansomwareInitial Access Broker (IAB)Bulletproof Hosting (BPH)
MOTIVATION
Financial gainCybercrime infrastructure provision
IMPACT
C2 serversRansomware-affected systemsOperational Impact: Data exfiltration and ransomware deployment
DATA BREACH
Personally identifiable informationPayment informationCorporate dataSensitivity Of Data: High
JANUARY 2018
755Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Jan 2018Ryuk Labs
Ryuk, Rhysida, Conti and Play: SystemBC Malware Turns Windows Machines Into SOCKS5 Proxies for Ransomware Attacks

SystemBC Malware: A Persistent Proxy and RAT Tool in Ransomware Attacks

639After Incident
CRITICAL-116
BLUCONPLARYU1782822739
SystemBC Malware: A Persistent Proxy and RAT Tool in Ransomware Attacks SystemBC, also known as Coroxy, is a long-standing Windows malware family first detected in exploit kits around 2018–2019. Initially a secondary payload, it has since evolved into a widely used commodity tool, frequently deployed alongside loaders like Buer, QBot, and Emotet. Its lightweight, modular design and dual functionality as both a SOCKS5 proxy and remote-access trojan (RAT) make it a favored component in ransomware operations, including those linked to Ryuk, Conti, Egregor, BlackBasta, Play, and Rhysida. The malware follows a predictable infection lifecycle: after initial access, it copies itself into a randomly named file under `%ProgramData%`, establishes persistence via a registry Run key and scheduled task, and employs anti-detection measures such as skipping installation if security software like Emsisoft’s a2guard.exe is detected. Some variants use in-memory droppers to unpack secondary binaries, either injecting them into processes or executing them from disk. SystemBC’s defining feature is its SOCKS5 proxy capability, which allows attackers to route command-and-control (C2) and exfiltration traffic through compromised hosts. Newer versions increasingly use Tor for anonymity, blending malicious traffic with legitimate enterprise flows to evade detection. Operators manage live SOCKS sessions via a control panel that supports auto-updates, authentication, and tens of thousands of simultaneous connections. Early versions relied on encrypted beacons (RC4-encrypted host/user data) for C2 communication, while newer builds shift traffic to Tor using embedded directory-authority IPs. The malware supports a range of payloads EXE, DLL, shellcode, VBS, BAT, CMD, and PowerShell many executed in memory to avoid disk writes. For threat actors, SystemBC is rarely the end goal but a force multiplier, enabling stealthy lateral movement and tool reuse across access-as-a-service chains. Its presence often signals broader compromise, including credential theft and further malware deployment. Defenders are advised to monitor unusual outbound SOCKS/Tor connections, suspicious scheduled tasks, and in-memory execution techniques, while network segmentation and egress filtering can limit its impact.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MalwareRansomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gainData exfiltrationLateral movement
IMPACT
Windows
JANUARY 1989
753Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Jan 1989Ryuk Labs
Ryuk and Conti: From floppy discs to Claude Mythos, how ransomware grew into a multibillion‑dollar industry

The Evolution of Ransomware: Historical and Modern Threats

410After Incident
CRITICAL-343
RYUARC1776788790
The Evolution of Ransomware: From Floppy Disks to AI-Powered Extortion In 1989, evolutionary biologist Joseph Popp created the first known ransomware a crude but prescient scheme designed to raise awareness about public health risks. Distributing 20,000 floppy disks under the guise of an AIDS research survey, Popp’s malware locked users’ files (or rather, their filenames) and demanded payment for restoration. Though his motives were unconventional, the attack foreshadowed a criminal industry that would later cripple economies. Popp was arrested for blackmail but deemed mentally unfit for trial. By the mid-1990s, researchers warned of ransomware’s potential as a large-scale extortion tool, but two critical developments were needed to turn it into a viable criminal enterprise: untraceable communication and anonymous payments. The Tor network, released in 2004, provided the former, while cryptocurrencies particularly Bitcoin ATMs appearing in 2013 enabled the latter. The mid-2010s marked the rise of "commodity ransomware," with strains like Cryptolocker proving that victims would pay small ransoms to recover encrypted data. As competition grew, criminals shifted tactics. By 2018, second-generation ransomware like Ryuk abandoned indiscriminate attacks in favor of targeting high-value businesses, negotiating ransoms, and even assisting with decryption driving payouts into the millions. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the threat, as remote work exposed unsecured devices and networks. Meanwhile, advancements in backup systems and stricter data regulations like GDPR led to a new strategy: double extortion. By 2019, gangs began stealing sensitive data before encrypting it, threatening to leak it unless paid. This model turned ransomware into a multibillion-dollar industry, with groups like Russia-backed Conti setting record demands including attacks on hospitals and critical infrastructure. Today, fourth-generation ransomware leverages AI to lower the barrier to entry. Criminals can now lease malware on the dark web, while tools like Anthropic’s Claude Mythos demonstrate AI’s ability to outperform humans in hacking. Despite law enforcement crackdowns and improved defenses, roughly a quarter of breaches still result in ransom payments. Many organizations remain vulnerable due to outdated software, while geopolitical tensions shield state-tolerated cybercriminals from consequences. From Popp’s floppy disks to AI-driven extortion, ransomware has evolved into a persistent, adaptive threat one that continues to exploit gaps in cybersecurity and public apathy.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Public health awareness (initial)Financial extortionData theft and double extortionGeopolitical influence
IMPACT
Financial Loss: Billions of dollars in ransom paymentsData Compromised: Sensitive data stolen and leakedHospitalsCritical infrastructureHigh-value businessesOperational Impact: Crippled economies and operationsIdentity Theft Risk: High (due to data leaks)Payment Information Risk: High (due to data leaks)
DATA BREACH
Sensitive dataPersonally identifiable informationSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: Yes (double extortion tactic)Data Encryption: Yes (ransomware encryption)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Ryuk Labs ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Ryuk Labs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Ryuk Labs ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Ryuk Labs's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?