Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital HamiltonRobert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton
VS
GeisingerGeisinger
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton

One Hamilton Health Place, Hamilton, NJ, 08690, US

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

Located in Hamilton Township, NJ, RWJ Hamilton is part of RWJBarnabas Health and is affiliated with the Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey. RWJ Hamilton serves communities within a five-county area and includes an a...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:484
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Geisinger

Geisinger

100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, Pa., US, 17822

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
482/1000Critical

Geisinger is among the nation’s leading providers of value-based care, serving 1.2 million people in urban and rural communities across Pennsylvania. Founded in 1915 by philanthropist Abigail Geisinger, the nonprofit system generates $10 billion in annual revenues acros...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:15,511
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Geisinger

Geisinger

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Geisinger has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Geisinger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geisinger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Geisinger

Geisinger

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GEINUAMIC1770196655
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GEI1767779516
🔒 Incident : Breach
NUAGEI1773772921

FAQ

Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton company and Geisinger company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton and Geisinger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton and Geisinger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton or Geisinger ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton or Geisinger ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton and Geisinger, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Hamilton and Geisinger, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8