Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Rutgers University

Rutgers University Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

rutgers.edu

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, stands among America’s highest-ranked, most diverse public research universities. The oldest, largest, and top-ranked public university in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, you’ll find us at our main locations in three New Jersey cities, and our footprint can be seen around the region. We’re an academic, health, and research powerhouse and a university of opportunity.


Rutgers University A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Rutgers University
Company Information
Website:http://www.rutgers.edu
Employees number:18,275
Number of followers:508,551
NAICS:6113
Industry Type:Higher Education
Homepage:rutgers.edu
Rutgers University Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
logo
Rutgers UniversityHigher Education
Updated:
24/06/2026
680/1000
Weak
B
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Rutgers University Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Rutgers UniversityHigher Education
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Rutgers University
Rutgers UniversityWeak
Current Score
680B (WEAK)
01000
4 incidents
-61 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
682Before Incident
JUNE 2026
678Before Incident
MAY 2026
713Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 May 2026Rutgers University
Instructure Inc., Yale University, Princeton University, Stanford University, Harvard University, Rutgers University and Adelaide University: Multiple Colleges Hit by Disruptions After Canvas Service Hack

Cyberattack Disrupts Canvas Learning Portal at Major Universities Worldwide

675After Incident
CRITICAL-38
THEYALRUTHARSTAINSPRI1778258906
Cyberattack Disrupts Canvas Learning Portal at Major Universities Worldwide Hackers breached Instructure Inc.’s Canvas platform this month, forcing the company to temporarily suspend services for thousands of colleges and universities globally. The attack, detected on May 1, exploited a vulnerability in a teacher-specific account, granting unauthorized access to some of the company’s websites. While much of the service was restored by May 2, affected teacher accounts remain suspended. Canvas, a widely used learning management system, supports critical academic functions, including exams, assignments, and grade tracking. The outage impacted institutions such as Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, Yale, Columbia, the University of Oslo, and Australia’s Adelaide University, disrupting operations for students and faculty. The extent of data exposure remains unclear, though some universities reported potential breaches of user information. Yale warned that names, email addresses, and internal messages may have been accessed, while Stanford flagged possible exposure of student IDs and communications. Rutgers and Baylor noted uncertainty around compromised data, with Baylor cautioning about subsequent phishing attempts targeting students. The cybercrime group ShinyHunters claimed responsibility in a dark web post, though Instructure has not confirmed their involvement. Known for data theft and extortion, the group has previously targeted educational institutions, including a 2023 wave of attacks on Ivy League schools that exposed alumni and student records. Instructure, acquired by private equity firm KKR in a $4.8 billion deal earlier this year, was previously majority-owned by Thoma Bravo. The Salt Lake City-based company, founded in 2008, has not disclosed whether sensitive data was exfiltrated during the incident.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Data theft, extortion
IMPACT
Data Compromised: User information, names, email addresses, internal messages, student IDs, communicationsSystems Affected: Canvas learning management systemDowntime: Temporary suspension of servicesOperational Impact: Disruption of exams, assignments, and grade trackingBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to Instructure and affected universitiesIdentity Theft Risk: Potential risk due to exposure of personally identifiable information
DATA BREACH
NamesEmail addressesInternal messagesStudent IDsCommunicationsSensitivity Of Data: Personally identifiable informationPersonally Identifiable Information: Names, email addresses, student IDs
Cyber Attack
01 May 2026Rutgers University
Instructure, Udemy, Harvard, Rutgers and Columbia: Inherited Trust: Why Education Environments Keep Getting Breached Globally

Cyberattacks on Education Sector: Identity Abuse and SaaS Exploitation Drive Surge in Breaches

675After Incident
CRITICAL-38
INSRUTUDEHARCOL1782312004
Cyberattacks on Education Sector Evolve: Identity Abuse and SaaS Exploitation Drive Surge in Breaches Cyberattacks targeting educational institutions have shifted from opportunistic ransomware campaigns to sophisticated, identity-driven intrusions leveraging trusted platforms and valid credentials. Recent incidents linked to the threat group ShinyHunters including breaches at Udemy and Instructure (Canvas) highlight a growing trend: attackers no longer breach systems externally but instead operate within them, exploiting SaaS access, federated identities, and operational trust to evade detection. ### Key Trends and Incidents - Rising Threat Volume: Cyber incidents in the education sector surged 63% year-over-year, with 425 reported attacks between November 2024 and October 2025 up from 260 the prior year. Data breaches increased by 73%, while hacktivist activity rose 75% across 67 countries. The UK’s Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026 found that 98% of universities and 88% of further education colleges experienced a breach in the past 12 months, far exceeding the broader business average. - Udemy Breach (2025): ShinyHunters compromised 1.4 million records, including PII, instructor payout data, and corporate details, after the company refused extortion demands. The leaked data was later indexed by Have I Been Pwned, amplifying downstream phishing and credential-stuffing risks. - Canvas Breach (May 2026): The group exfiltrated 3.65TB of data tied to 275 million students, faculty, and staff across 9,000 schools worldwide. Attackers exploited "Free-for-Teacher" accounts to pivot into the SaaS platform, defacing 330 institution login portals including those of Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, and Rutgers and disrupting operations during critical academic periods. ### Attack Vectors: Identity Debt and SaaS Abuse - Identity Persistence as a Weakness: Educational institutions struggle with "identity debt" accumulated credentials from alumni, shared lab access, and temporary research accounts that persist beyond their intended use. Attackers exploit these valid but unmanaged identities to move laterally without triggering traditional security alerts. - SaaS as the New Intrusion Layer: Once inside, attackers embed themselves in cloud platforms (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Canvas) rather than endpoints. Techniques include: - OAuth abuse (e.g., granting Mail.Read or Files.Read.All permissions). - Mailbox manipulation (forwarding rules, suppressed security alerts). - API-driven access to reduce visibility. - Federated Identity Risks: Cross-institution collaboration via federated systems expands the blast radius of a single compromised identity. The Canvas breach demonstrated how a vendor compromise could cascade into sector-wide disruption. ### Operational Shifts in Extortion Tactics - Ransomware’s Decline as a Primary Tool: While ransomware persists, groups like ShinyHunters now prioritize data theft, leak-site pressure, and public exposure over encryption. The Canvas attack coincided with finals season, maximizing reputational and operational damage. - IT Impersonation and Social Engineering: Attackers pose as IT support staff to initiate MFA resets, password changes, or device registrations, exploiting operational trust rather than software vulnerabilities. ### Broader Implications The education sector’s open, collaborative model reliant on shared SaaS platforms, federated identities, and decentralized administration creates systemic vulnerabilities. As attackers refine their methods, the focus has shifted from preventing unauthorized access to detecting abuse of legitimate credentials and mitigating cross-institution propagation. The recent breaches underscore that vendor compromise now equals institutional compromise, with single intrusions capable of disrupting thousands of schools simultaneously.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachIdentity AbuseSaaS Exploitation
MOTIVATION
Data TheftExtortionReputational DamageOperational Disruption
IMPACT
PIIInstructor Payout DataCorporate DetailsStudent/Faculty/Staff DataMicrosoft 365Google WorkspaceCanvasInstitution Login PortalsOperational Impact: Disruption during critical academic periods (e.g., finals season)Brand Reputation Impact: Defacement of 330 institution login portals (e.g., Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, Rutgers)Identity Theft Risk: Downstream phishing and credential-stuffing risks
DATA BREACH
PIIInstructor Payout DataCorporate DetailsStudent/Faculty/Staff Data1.4 million (Udemy)3.65TB (Canvas)Sensitivity Of Data: High (PII, academic records, operational data)
APRIL 2026
797Before Incident
Breach
24 Apr 2026Rutgers University
Udemy, McGraw-Hill, Vercel and Harvard University: Udemy Data Breach – ShinyHunters Allegedly Claims Compromise of 1.4M User Records

ShinyHunters Claims Major Data Breach of Udemy, Threatens to Leak 1.4M Records

713After Incident
CRITICAL-84
MCGVERHARUDE1777034314
ShinyHunters Claims Major Data Breach of Udemy, Threatens to Leak 1.4M Records On April 24, 2026, the cybercriminal group ShinyHunters announced a data breach targeting Udemy, one of the world’s largest online learning platforms, alleging the theft of over 1.4 million records containing personally identifiable information (PII) and internal corporate data. The group issued a "Pay or Leak" ultimatum, demanding a response from Udemy by April 27, 2026, or risk public exposure of the stolen data. ShinyHunters, a financially motivated extortion group active since 2019, has built a reputation for high-profile breaches, including the 2020 theft of 200 million records from 13 companies. In 2026 alone, the group has intensified attacks on SaaS platforms and the education sector, with recent victims including Vercel, McGraw-Hill, and Harvard University (where 115,000 alumni records were exposed). Google Threat Intelligence tracks the group under the designation UNC6240, noting its shift from traditional network exploitation to social engineering, MFA bypass, and credential harvesting. ShinyHunters often exploits third-party integrations and compromised vendor credentials, as seen in the Vercel breach, where a third-party vendor (Context.ai) served as the entry point. The education sector remains a prime target, with ShinyHunters previously breaching India’s Unacademy, stealing over 10 million user accounts. As of publication, Udemy has not confirmed or denied the breach, and researchers continue monitoring the group’s leak site for potential data release following the deadline. The incident underscores the group’s evolving tactics and persistent focus on high-value targets.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
MOTIVATION
Financial Extortion
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 1.4 million recordsIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Personally Identifiable Information (PII)Internal Corporate DataNumber Of Records Exposed: 1.4 millionSensitivity Of Data: High
MARCH 2026
797Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
797Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
796Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
796Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
796Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
796Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
796Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
795Before Incident
JUNE 2018
806Before Incident
Data Leak
16 Jun 2018Rutgers University
Rutgers University

Rutgers Data Breach

734After Incident
MEDIUM-72
RUT1206323
Rutgers suffered from a data breach incident that exposed 1,700 students personal information. Students in the computer science department were impacted by this breach, which exposed data such as Rutgers I.D. numbers, cumulative GPAs, and Spring 2018 class schedules. All pupils whose information was disclosed were informed of the mistake and given the assurance that their information had not been altered. To ensure that this kind of error does not happen again, the pertinent security policies have been reviewed and modified. This data did not contain private information like Social Security numbers, residences, or financial details.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Rutgers I.D. numberscumulative GPAsSpring 2018 class schedules
DATA BREACH
Rutgers I.D. numberscumulative GPAsSpring 2018 class schedulesNumber Of Records Exposed: 1,700

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Rutgers University ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Rutgers University's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Rutgers University ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Rutgers University's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
Rutgers University Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo