Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rutgers University–New BrunswickRutgers University–New Brunswick
VS
Yale UniversityYale University
Rutgers University–New Brunswick

Rutgers University–New Brunswick

57 US Highway 1, New Brunswick, 08901, US

Last Update: 11/12/2025

View Profile
786/1000Fair

Rutgers University–New Brunswick is the flagship home of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. We are a leading national research university committed to excellence in teaching, innovative research across a broad spectrum of subjects, and service that improves ou...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:6,640
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Yale University

Yale University

Woodbridge Hall, New Haven, CT, US, 6520

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://news.yale.edu/
777/1000Fair

For more than 300 years, Yale University has inspired the minds that inspire the world. Based in New Haven, Connecticut, Yale brings people and ideas together for positive impact around the globe. A research university that focuses on students and encourages learning as...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:19,333
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rutgers University–New Brunswick

Rutgers University–New Brunswick

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Yale University

Yale University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rutgers University–New Brunswick in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Yale University has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Rutgers University–New Brunswick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rutgers University–New Brunswick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Yale University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yale University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rutgers University–New Brunswick

Rutgers University–New Brunswick

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Yale University

Yale University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THEYALRUTHARSTAINSPRI1778258906

FAQ

Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick company and Yale University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick and Yale University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick and Yale University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rutgers University–New Brunswick or Yale University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rutgers University–New Brunswick or Yale University ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick and Yale University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rutgers University–New Brunswick and Yale University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1