Comparison Overview
Rutgers University–New Brunswick

Rutgers University–New Brunswick
57 US Highway 1, New Brunswick, 08901, US
Last Update: 11/12/2025
Rutgers University–New Brunswick is the flagship home of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. We are a leading national research university committed to excellence in teaching, innovative research across a broad spectrum of subjects, and service that improves ou...

Virginia Tech
800 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, 24061, US
Last Update: 08/05/2026
Dedicated to its motto, Ut Prosim (That I May Serve), Virginia Tech takes a hands-on, engaging approach to education, preparing scholars to be leaders in their fields and communities. As the commonwealth’s most comprehensive university and its leading research instituti...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Rutgers University–New Brunswick







Virginia Tech






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rutgers University–New Brunswick in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Virginia Tech has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Rutgers University–New Brunswick (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rutgers University–New Brunswick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Virginia Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virginia Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Rutgers University–New Brunswick

Virginia Tech
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in Mstfakts College-Management-System. This affects the function session_start of the file Front-end/server.php of the component Authentication. Executing a manipulation can lead to session fixiation. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was found in anirbandutta9 College-Notes-Gallery up to 8c1cf3d98f30982d069c88ca172612c001eb39f6. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /dashboard/userprofile.php?section=admin1. Performing a manipulation of the argument image results in unrestricted upload. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
ReactPress is a publishing system for React developers. Prior to version 3.7.0, ReactPress API list endpoints build TypeORM `QueryBuilder` conditions using unsanitized HTTP query parameter names as SQL column identifiers (e.g. `` `article.${key}` ``). TypeORM parameterizes values but not column names, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject SQL through crafted query string keys. Version 3.7.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, allowlist allowed filter column names before interpolating into SQL.
plone.app.dexterity is a content-type system for the Plone content management system, and plone.app.contenttypes provides Plone’s Dexterity-based content types. Plone.app.dexterity versions through 3.2.2, 4.0.0 through 4.1.2, and 5.0.0, and plone.app.contenttypes versions through 3.0.11, 4.0.0 through 4.0.9, and 5.0.0 are vulnerable to denial of service because an authenticated user can create content with excessively long titles, descriptions, or uploaded-file names, causing Plone to become unresponsive and potentially making the resulting content difficult to edit or delete. The vulnerability is patched in plone.app.dexterity versions 3.2.3, 4.1.3, and 5.0.1, and in plone.app.contenttypes versions 3.0.12, 4.0.10, and 5.0.1.
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contenttypes/commit/13dc98a578341aac24a1e65fd9bc7ac8a07d168a
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contenttypes/commit/21bae6ebe424689eeac9a5884fc0da35f4944e63
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contenttypes/commit/639c0619f371df578e69ec94e5ca98e60fd6ed58
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contenttypes/commit/7bb03e8ec6c6bd0e645f445b0755e85a51afb158
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contenttypes/commit/bed1547d4f8b1fc995f2c76f30ba5f20276a8ad6
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contenttypes/security/advisories/GHSA-8pcw-h6w9-h46g
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.dexterity/commit/0d317df663823445200d0569a66a95b7e4a9c50d
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.dexterity/commit/2fdceb120ca86682a408f3a14753cfcf5126d9d9
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.dexterity/commit/411689047f9a3521899ae6992a9b0efbd0592a8f
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.dexterity/commit/cbcef731c0882146b9bf30688cdc639d879878fb
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.dexterity/commit/f3596538cf7670bb8bc27b0dfa0b1da41c8b8a3a
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.dexterity/commit/fb45bfdb18f1dfb3ed55e477947a3df9a6ee9e20
- https://github.com/plone/plone.app.dexterity/security/advisories/GHSA-5426-92w4-wvhv
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.