Comparison Overview
Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences

Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences
New Brunswick, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The School of Arts and Sciences is the liberal arts school of Rutgers University–New Brunswick, offering more than 100 majors and minors across life sciences, mathematical and physical sciences, humanities, and social and behavioral sciences. The School of Arts and Sci...

University of South Florida
4202 East Fowler Ave, Address 2, Tampa, Florida, US, 33620-9951
Last Update: 13/09/2026
The University of South Florida, a high-impact research university dedicated to student success and committed to community engagement, generates an annual economic impact of more than $6 billion. With campuses in Tampa, St. Petersburg and Sarasota-Manatee, USF serves ap...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences







University of South Florida






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of South Florida in 2026.
Incident History - Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of South Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of South Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences

University of South Florida
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.