Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Russian RailwaysRussian Railways
VS
SBB CFF FFSSBB CFF FFS
Russian Railways

Russian Railways

Novaya Basmannaya Str., 2, Moscow, 107174, RU

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://eng.rzd.ru/
830/1000Good

Russian Railways is Russia’s leading railway company and one of the largest companies in the global transport sector. The Company is a natural monopoly and fully owned by the Russian Federation. Our primary goal is to meet the state’s rail transport and employment needs...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:851
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
SBB CFF FFS

SBB CFF FFS

Hilfikerstrasse 1, Bern, 3000, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sbb.ch/jobs
783/1000Fair

We shape the mobility of the future – simple, personal, connected. SBB’s comprehensive service contract allows us to offer a wide range of exciting careers in all areas of business. Thanks to this variety, many different career paths are possible, which we support th...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:17,994
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Russian Railways

Russian Railways

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SBB CFF FFS

SBB CFF FFS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Russian Railways in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SBB CFF FFS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Russian Railways (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Russian Railways cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SBB CFF FFS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SBB CFF FFS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Russian Railways

Russian Railways

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
RUS1767603355
SBB CFF FFS

SBB CFF FFS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Russian Railways company and SBB CFF FFS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Russian Railways and SBB CFF FFS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Russian Railways and SBB CFF FFS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Russian Railways or SBB CFF FFS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Russian Railways or SBB CFF FFS ?
Between Russian Railways and SBB CFF FFS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Russian Railways and SBB CFF FFS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA