Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rumpke Waste & RecyclingRumpke Waste & Recycling
VS
Veolia | Water TechVeolia | Water Tech
Rumpke Waste & Recycling

Rumpke Waste & Recycling

3990 Generation Drive, Cincinnati, 45251, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.rumpke.com/
519/1000Critical

Rumpke Waste and Recycling has been committed to keeping neighborhoods and businesses clean and green since 1932 by providing environmentally friendly waste disposal and recycling solutions. Headquartered in Colerain Township, Ohio, just outside of Cincinnati, Rumpke is...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:1,641
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Veolia | Water Tech

Veolia | Water Tech

30, Rue Madeleine Vionnet, Aubervilliers, Île-de-France, FR, 93300

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

As the world leader in water technologies and services, Veolia relies on its 17,500 water technology experts to deliver innovative solutions that drive both performance and sustainability, without compromise. With over 4,400 technology patents and serving more than 14,0...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:12,441
Subsidiaries:70
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rumpke Waste & Recycling

Rumpke Waste & Recycling

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Veolia | Water Tech

Veolia | Water Tech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Rumpke Waste & Recycling has 41.18% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Veolia | Water Tech in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rumpke Waste & Recycling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rumpke Waste & Recycling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Veolia | Water Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Veolia | Water Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rumpke Waste & Recycling

Rumpke Waste & Recycling

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RUM1768350699
🔒 Incident : Breach
RUM224072525
Veolia | Water Tech

Veolia | Water Tech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Veolia | Water Tech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling and Veolia | Water Tech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling and Veolia | Water Tech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rumpke Waste & Recycling or Veolia | Water Tech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rumpke Waste & Recycling or Veolia | Water Tech ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling and Veolia | Water Tech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling and Veolia | Water Tech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8