Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rumpke Waste & RecyclingRumpke Waste & Recycling
VS
Eiffage Énergie SystèmesEiffage Énergie Systèmes
Rumpke Waste & Recycling

Rumpke Waste & Recycling

3990 Generation Drive, Cincinnati, 45251, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.rumpke.com/
519/1000Critical

Rumpke Waste and Recycling has been committed to keeping neighborhoods and businesses clean and green since 1932 by providing environmentally friendly waste disposal and recycling solutions. Headquartered in Colerain Township, Ohio, just outside of Cincinnati, Rumpke is...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:1,641
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Eiffage Énergie Systèmes

Eiffage Énergie Systèmes

3-7 place de l’Europe, Vélizy-Villacoublay, 78140, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile

Rejoindre Eiffage, c’est rejoindre une entreprise animée d’un esprit de famille unique. Nous recherchons des talents qui valorisent l’esprit d’équipe et l’entraide et qui souhaitent découvrir, progresser, innover dans un collectif engagé pour construire un avenir à tai...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:14,833
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rumpke Waste & Recycling

Rumpke Waste & Recycling

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Eiffage Énergie Systèmes

Eiffage Énergie Systèmes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Rumpke Waste & Recycling has 42.86% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eiffage Énergie Systèmes in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rumpke Waste & Recycling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rumpke Waste & Recycling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Eiffage Énergie Systèmes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eiffage Énergie Systèmes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rumpke Waste & Recycling

Rumpke Waste & Recycling

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RUM1768350699
🔒 Incident : Breach
RUM224072525
Eiffage Énergie Systèmes

Eiffage Énergie Systèmes

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling company and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rumpke Waste & Recycling or Eiffage Énergie Systèmes ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rumpke Waste & Recycling or Eiffage Énergie Systèmes ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rumpke Waste & Recycling and Eiffage Énergie Systèmes, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8