Comparison Overview

Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation

VS

Delivery Hero

Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Rails Foundation is a non-profit foundation set up to improve the documentation, education, marketing, and events of the Ruby on Rails framework to the benefit of all new and existing Rails developers, and to ensure a prosperous ecosystem that continues to improve for decades to come. In alphabetical order, the eight founding core members of the foundation are: Cookpad, Doximity, Fleetio, GitHub, Intercom, Procore, Shopify, and 37signals.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Delivery Hero

Oranienburger Straße 70, Berlin, Berlin, 10117, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

As the world’s leading local delivery platform, our mission is to deliver an amazing experience, fast, easy, and to your door. We operate in over 70+ countries worldwide, powered by tech but driven by people. As one of Europe’s largest tech platforms, we enable ambitious talent to deliver solutions that create impact within our ecosystem. We move fast, take action and adapt. No matter where you’re from or what you believe in, we build, we deliver, we lead. We are Delivery Hero.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 35,649
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ruby-on-rails-org.jpeg
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delivery-hero-se.jpeg
Delivery Hero
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Delivery Hero
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delivery Hero in 2025.

Incident History — Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Delivery Hero (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delivery Hero cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ruby-on-rails-org.jpeg
Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Motivation: Unauthorized actions, Data exfiltration, Fraudulent transactions
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delivery-hero-se.jpeg
Delivery Hero
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Delivery Hero company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Delivery Hero company has not reported any.

In the current year, Delivery Hero company and Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Delivery Hero company nor Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Delivery Hero company nor Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Delivery Hero company nor Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Delivery Hero company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation nor Delivery Hero holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Delivery Hero company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation company.

Delivery Hero company employs more people globally than Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation nor Delivery Hero holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation nor Delivery Hero holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation nor Delivery Hero holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation nor Delivery Hero holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation nor Delivery Hero holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ruby on Rails - The Rails Foundation nor Delivery Hero holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: hide VRAM sysfs attributes on GPUs without VRAM Otherwise accessing them can cause a crash.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Fix NULL pointer dereference in VRAM logic for APU devices Previously, APU platforms (and other scenarios with uninitialized VRAM managers) triggered a NULL pointer dereference in `ttm_resource_manager_usage()`. The root cause is not that the `struct ttm_resource_manager *man` pointer itself is NULL, but that `man->bdev` (the backing device pointer within the manager) remains uninitialized (NULL) on APUs—since APUs lack dedicated VRAM and do not fully set up VRAM manager structures. When `ttm_resource_manager_usage()` attempts to acquire `man->bdev->lru_lock`, it dereferences the NULL `man->bdev`, leading to a kernel OOPS. 1. **amdgpu_cs.c**: Extend the existing bandwidth control check in `amdgpu_cs_get_threshold_for_moves()` to include a check for `ttm_resource_manager_used()`. If the manager is not used (uninitialized `bdev`), return 0 for migration thresholds immediately—skipping VRAM-specific logic that would trigger the NULL dereference. 2. **amdgpu_kms.c**: Update the `AMDGPU_INFO_VRAM_USAGE` ioctl and memory info reporting to use a conditional: if the manager is used, return the real VRAM usage; otherwise, return 0. This avoids accessing `man->bdev` when it is NULL. 3. **amdgpu_virt.c**: Modify the vf2pf (virtual function to physical function) data write path. Use `ttm_resource_manager_used()` to check validity: if the manager is usable, calculate `fb_usage` from VRAM usage; otherwise, set `fb_usage` to 0 (APUs have no discrete framebuffer to report). This approach is more robust than APU-specific checks because it: - Works for all scenarios where the VRAM manager is uninitialized (not just APUs), - Aligns with TTM's design by using its native helper function, - Preserves correct behavior for discrete GPUs (which have fully initialized `man->bdev` and pass the `ttm_resource_manager_used()` check). v4: use ttm_resource_manager_used(&adev->mman.vram_mgr.manager) instead of checking the adev->gmc.is_app_apu flag (Christian)

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exfat: fix improper check of dentry.stream.valid_size We found an infinite loop bug in the exFAT file system that can lead to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition. When a dentry in an exFAT filesystem is malformed, the following system calls — SYS_openat, SYS_ftruncate, and SYS_pwrite64 — can cause the kernel to hang. Root cause analysis shows that the size validation code in exfat_find() does not check whether dentry.stream.valid_size is negative. As a result, the system calls mentioned above can succeed and eventually trigger the DoS issue. This patch adds a check for negative dentry.stream.valid_size to prevent this vulnerability.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb/server: fix possible memory leak in smb2_read() Memory leak occurs when ksmbd_vfs_read() fails. Fix this by adding the missing kvfree().

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb/server: fix possible refcount leak in smb2_sess_setup() Reference count of ksmbd_session will leak when session need reconnect. Fix this by adding the missing ksmbd_user_session_put().