Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America CompanyRoofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company
VS
Royal BAM GroupRoyal BAM Group
Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company

Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company

3810 Paule Ave, St. Louis, 63125, MO

Last Update: 03/06/2026

View Profile

Roofing Services & Solutions, a Tecta America company is a nationally recognized, design-bid-build roofing contractor covering projects of all sizes for the commercial, industrial and institutional markets. With multiple locations, including St. Louis and Columbia, Mo.,...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Royal BAM Group

Royal BAM Group

Runnenburg 9, Bunnik, NL, 3981 AZ

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bam.com/
773/1000Fair

🏗️ Building a sustainable tomorrow at BAM! As leaders in the construction industry, we are committed to pioneering sustainable practices that not only enhance our projects but also contribute to a better future for generations to come. Our strategy revolves around f...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:15,560
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company

Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Royal BAM Group

Royal BAM Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal BAM Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Royal BAM Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal BAM Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company

Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Royal BAM Group

Royal BAM Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company and Royal BAM Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company and Royal BAM Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company or Royal BAM Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company or Royal BAM Group ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company and Royal BAM Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Roofing Services & Solutions a Tecta America Company and Royal BAM Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
Rssroofingservices&solutions vs Royal-bam-group - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating | Rankiteo