Comparison Overview
RSK Geosciences

RSK Geosciences
172 Chester Road, Helsby, WA6 0AR, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
RSK Geosciences is a leading UK-based environmental, geotechnical, surveying, and geophysics consultancy, part of the RSK Group. Staffed by more than 300 professionals, we have been operating for more than 30 years. Our highly dedicated and skilled team comprises charte...

SUEZ
La Défense, Paris, 92040, FR
Last Update: 13/09/2026
We provide essential services in the water and waste sectors to preserve resources and improve quality of life wherever we operate. As a global player for over 160 years, we support public and private actors with resilient and innovative solutions. With a presence in ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

RSK Geosciences







SUEZ






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for RSK Geosciences in 2026.
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SUEZ in 2026.
Incident History - RSK Geosciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RSK Geosciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SUEZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SUEZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

RSK Geosciences

SUEZ
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.