Comparison Overview
RSK LDE (Land and Development Engineering)

RSK LDE (Land and Development Engineering)
Beecham Court, Wigan, WN3 6PR, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
RSK’s highly skilled Land and Development Engineering (LDE) team consists of Civil/Structural Engineers and Hydrologists that understand clients’ key concerns in these areas and has many years’ experience of providing expert consultancy to landowners, investors, develop...

Parsons Corporation
14291 Park Meadow Dr, Chantilly, Virginia, US, 20151
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Founded in 1944, Parsons Corporation, a digitally enabled solutions provider, is focused on creating the future of the defense, intelligence, and critical infrastructure markets. From Earth to outer space, we deliver tomorrow’s solutions today. Equipped with the capabil...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

RSK LDE (Land and Development Engineering)







Parsons Corporation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for RSK LDE (Land and Development Engineering) in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parsons Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - RSK LDE (Land and Development Engineering) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RSK LDE (Land and Development Engineering) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Parsons Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Parsons Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

RSK LDE (Land and Development Engineering)

Parsons Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.