Comparison Overview
RSK Ireland Ltd.

RSK Ireland Ltd.
Redwood House, , Belfast & Dublin, N.Ireland / Ireland, BT9 5NF, IE
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Our team works across a variety of client groups offering environmental consultancy services to support planning applications, renewable energy development, site development works, property management and construction. Our work includes projects within sectors as div...

Rentokil Initial
Compass House, Manor Royal, Crawley, RH10 9PY, GB
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Rentokil Initial plc employs c.68,500 people across 89 countries - offering the experience and expertise of a multi-national organisation, whilst delivering services with the agility and characteristics of a local business. As world leaders in Pest Control and Hygiene...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

RSK Ireland Ltd.







Rentokil Initial






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for RSK Ireland Ltd. in 2026.
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rentokil Initial in 2026.
Incident History - RSK Ireland Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RSK Ireland Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Rentokil Initial (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rentokil Initial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

RSK Ireland Ltd.

Rentokil Initial
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.