Comparison Overview
RSK Environment

RSK Environment
Spring Lodge, Helsby, Cheshire, WA6 0AR, GB
Last Update: 15/03/2026
RSK Environment provides high quality advice to clients on all environmental matters to ensure timely and successful delivery of major infrastructure projects during the planning, consenting and construction process. Our team is made up of environmental impact assessmen...

Environment Agency
Horizon House, Bristol, BS1 5AH, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We are the Environment Agency. We are the biggest and most wide-ranging environmental regulator in Europe. We work with businesses and communities to protect and improve the environment, for people and wildlife. And the need for our work is becoming ever more important....
Compliance Ranges Comparison

RSK Environment







Environment Agency






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for RSK Environment in 2026.
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Environment Agency in 2026.
Incident History - RSK Environment (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RSK Environment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Environment Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Environment Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

RSK Environment

Environment Agency
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.