Comparison Overview
RSK Ecology

RSK Ecology
Abbey Park, Humber Road, Coventry, CV3 4AQ, GB
Last Update: 22/02/2026
Our team offers a complete ecological service ranging from early engagement advice to surveys and monitoring, licensing and mitigation with experienced specialists in all major ecological disciplines. We cover both terrestrial and aquatic habitats and species and many o...

Clean Harbors
42 Longwater Drive, Norwell, 02061-9149, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Clean Harbors is North America’s leading provider of environmental and industrial services. The Company serves a diverse customer base, including a majority of Fortune 500 companies. Its customer base spans a number of industries, including chemical, and manufacturing, ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

RSK Ecology







Clean Harbors






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for RSK Ecology in 2026.
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Clean Harbors in 2026.
Incident History - RSK Ecology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RSK Ecology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Clean Harbors (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Clean Harbors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

RSK Ecology

Clean Harbors
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.