Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries LimitedRPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited
VS
SyscoSysco
RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

2/4 Judges Court Road, Kolkata, 700027, IN

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tooyumm.com
768/1000Fair

RPSG FMCG Business has made strong initial inroads by creating a new segment of snacks in the Indian market, with its brand “Too Yumm!” In a short period the brand has established itself across India as a strong choice vis a vis of traditional fried. This was possible b...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:618
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sysco

Sysco

1390 Enclave Parkway, Houston, 77079, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sysco.com
733/1000Moderate

Sysco is the global leader in selling, marketing and distributing food and related products to customers who prepare meals away from home. This includes restaurants, healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments, entertainment venues, and more. Sysco ope...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:32,467
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sysco

Sysco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sysco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sysco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sysco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sysco

Sysco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYS5792657090725
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYS222728523
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYS351072625

FAQ

Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and Sysco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited and Sysco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited and Sysco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited or Sysco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited or Sysco ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited and Sysco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited and Sysco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2