Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries LimitedRPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited
VS
GoTo FoodsGoTo Foods
RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

2/4 Judges Court Road, Kolkata, 700027, IN

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tooyumm.com
768/1000Fair

RPSG FMCG Business has made strong initial inroads by creating a new segment of snacks in the Indian market, with its brand “Too Yumm!” In a short period the brand has established itself across India as a strong choice vis a vis of traditional fried. This was possible b...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:618
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GoTo Foods

GoTo Foods

5620 Glenridge Drive, Atlanta, GA, US, 30342

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gotofoods.com
774/1000Fair

Atlanta-based platform company GoTo Foods (formerly known as Focus Brands) is a leading developer of global multi-channel foodservice brands. As of December 28 , 2025, GoTo Foods, through its affiliate brands, is the franchisor and operator of over 7,300 restaurants, ca...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:19,780
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GoTo Foods

GoTo Foods

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoTo Foods in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GoTo Foods (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoTo Foods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GoTo Foods

GoTo Foods

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOT724082025

FAQ

Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited company and GoTo Foods company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited and GoTo Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited and GoTo Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited or GoTo Foods ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited or GoTo Foods ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited and GoTo Foods, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RPSG (FMCG) - Guiltfree Industries Limited and GoTo Foods, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-10777
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-10775
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.4
Complexity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-22055
SUMMARY

Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-22054
SUMMARY

Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-10771
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-03
UPDATED
Date2026-06-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9