Comparison Overview
Roynat Capital
Roynat Capital
225 6 Avenue SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 1N2, CA
Last Update: 28/01/2026
We believe every company should have an opportunity to make their vision a reality. We look beyond the numbers to provide innovative long-term capital solutions to mid market companies across Canada. We have considerable expertise in growth, asset acquisitions, transiti...
M&T Bank
345 Main St., Buffalo, 14203, US
Last Update: 22/04/2026
Great companies have an enduring sense of purpose. At M&T, our purpose is a simple one: make a difference in people’s lives and uplift the communities we serve. Founded in 1856 in Buffalo, NY we are now a top 11 full-service US-based commercial bank with a retail footpr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Roynat Capital
M&T Bank
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Roynat Capital in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
M&T Bank has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Roynat Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Roynat Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - M&T Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
M&T Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Roynat Capital
M&T Bank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.