Comparison Overview
Royal Canin

Royal Canin
650, Avenue de la Petite Camargue, Aimargues, France, 30470, FR
Last Update: 18/12/2025
The Royal Canin company, owner of the ROYAL CANIN® brand, is a division of Mars Petcare and the global leader in Health Through Nutrition for cats and dogs. Founded in 1968 by French veterinarian Dr. Jean Cathary, Royal Canin has been continually working and partnering...

DuPont
974 Centre Road,, Wilmington, DE, US, 19805
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Beware of recruitment scams! Please read important information for job seekers: https://www.dupont.com/careers/hiring-faqs.html We’re creating advanced solutions that help transform industries and improve everyday life across our key markets of healthcare, water, const...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Royal Canin







DuPont






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Royal Canin in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DuPont in 2026.
Incident History - Royal Canin (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Royal Canin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DuPont (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DuPont cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Royal Canin

DuPont
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.