Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Royal HaskoningDHVRoyal HaskoningDHV
VS
FugroFugro
Royal HaskoningDHV

Royal HaskoningDHV

Laan 1914 35, Amersfoort, undefined, 3818 EX, NL

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://royalhaskoningdhv.com
775/1000Fair

Royal HaskoningDHV is an independent consulting engineering company that is dedicated to creating a positive impact on people and planet. Backed by the expertise of over 6,000 colleagues working from offices in more than 20 countries, and with more than 140 years ...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:7,628
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fugro

Fugro

Veurse Achterweg 10, Leidschendam, 2264 SG, NL

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fugro.com
784/1000Fair

We are the world’s leading Geo-data specialist, collecting and analysing comprehensive information about the Earth and the structures built upon it. Through integrated data acquisition, analysis and advice, we unlock insights from Geo-data to help our clients design, bu...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:10,678
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Royal HaskoningDHV

Royal HaskoningDHV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fugro

Fugro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal HaskoningDHV in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fugro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Royal HaskoningDHV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal HaskoningDHV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fugro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fugro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Royal HaskoningDHV

Royal HaskoningDHV

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fugro

Fugro

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV company and Fugro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV and Fugro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV and Fugro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Royal HaskoningDHV or Fugro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Royal HaskoningDHV or Fugro ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV and Fugro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Royal HaskoningDHV and Fugro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3