Comparison Overview

Royal Collection Trust

VS

Imperial War Museums

Royal Collection Trust

Buckingham Palace, London, GB, SW1A 1AA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rct.uk

Royal Collection Trust is one of the five departments of the Royal Household. We care for the Royal Collection, one of the world's greatest art collections, and manage the public opening of the official residences of His Majesty The King – Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh. Our work is undertaken without public funding of any kind. Income generated from admissions, our shops and other commercial initiatives funds the conservation of the Royal Collection and projects to increase access to and enjoyment of the Collection, such as exhibitions, publications and educational programmes. We employ over 500 people in a wide range of roles, from conservators and curators to marketers and merchandisers. We also recruit around 350 summer staff each year to help our front-of-house teams create a memorable experience for millions of visitors from all over the world. With Royal Collection Trust, you will be trained, supported and inspired to achieve the highest standards. Collaboration is at the heart of what we do, and whatever your role, you will play a key part in ensuring that the Royal Collection and Palaces are valued and enjoyed by everyone.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 414
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Imperial War Museums

Lambeth Road, London, undefined, SE1 6HZ, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.iwm.org.uk

IWM (Imperial War Museums) tells the story of people who have lived, fought and died in conflicts involving Britain and the Commonwealth from the First World War to the present day. Using its unique collections, IWM explores the causes of war and its impact on people’s lives, engaging audiences worldwide through its website, digital resources and across its five branches - IWM London, IWM North, IWM Duxford, Churchill War Rooms and HMS Belfast.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 702
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-collection-trust.jpeg
Royal Collection Trust
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-war-museum.jpeg
Imperial War Museums
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Collection Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Imperial War Museums
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Collection Trust in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imperial War Museums in 2026.

Incident History — Royal Collection Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Collection Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Imperial War Museums (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imperial War Museums cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-collection-trust.jpeg
Royal Collection Trust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-war-museum.jpeg
Imperial War Museums
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Imperial War Museums company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Royal Collection Trust company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Imperial War Museums company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal Collection Trust company.

In the current year, Imperial War Museums company and Royal Collection Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Imperial War Museums company nor Royal Collection Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Imperial War Museums company nor Royal Collection Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Imperial War Museums company nor Royal Collection Trust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Collection Trust company nor Imperial War Museums company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Imperial War Museums holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Royal Collection Trust company nor Imperial War Museums company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Imperial War Museums company employs more people globally than Royal Collection Trust company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Imperial War Museums holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Imperial War Museums holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Imperial War Museums holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Imperial War Museums holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Imperial War Museums holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Imperial War Museums holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References