Comparison Overview

Royal Collection Trust

VS

Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum

Royal Collection Trust

Buckingham Palace, London, GB, SW1A 1AA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rct.uk

Royal Collection Trust is one of the five departments of the Royal Household. We care for the Royal Collection, one of the world's greatest art collections, and manage the public opening of the official residences of His Majesty The King – Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh. Our work is undertaken without public funding of any kind. Income generated from admissions, our shops and other commercial initiatives funds the conservation of the Royal Collection and projects to increase access to and enjoyment of the Collection, such as exhibitions, publications and educational programmes. We employ over 500 people in a wide range of roles, from conservators and curators to marketers and merchandisers. We also recruit around 350 summer staff each year to help our front-of-house teams create a memorable experience for millions of visitors from all over the world. With Royal Collection Trust, you will be trained, supported and inspired to achieve the highest standards. Collaboration is at the heart of what we do, and whatever your role, you will play a key part in ensuring that the Royal Collection and Palaces are valued and enjoyed by everyone.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 414
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum

220 E. Ann Street, Ann Arbor, undefined, 48104, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aahom.org

The Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum (AAHOM) opened in 1982 in an historic firehouse in downtown Ann Arbor and quickly became the cornerstone of informal science education in the community. This was achieved by working with scientists, artists, designers, engineers, and innovators who transferred their extraordinary talents and knowledge into the creation of simple, effective science exhibits that can be understood by children, their families, and audiences of all ages. Following several expansions, AAHOM now occupies 40,000 square feet, with 20,000 devoted to exhibit space for 250+ interactive exhibits designed to promote science discovery and literacy. Over 6 million visitors have visited AAHOM since it first opened its doors, making it one of the most popular science centers in the State of Michigan. The mission of the AAHOM is to create moments of discovery that inspire curiosity, exploration, and respect for STEM, and the natural world . Our vision is a world where curiosity today leads to more purposeful lives tomorrow. Thanks to a steadfast belief in the power of STEaM when placed in the hands of pre-K through 8th Graders, we enjoy one of the highest annual attendance rates at a science center in Michigan: reaching nearly 400,000 each year. AAHOM education programs align with State of Michigan Grade Level Content Expectations (GLCE) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Our exhibits have been displayed in libraries, community centers and shopping malls throughout the state. AAHOM’s regional and national reputation was built on its visionary planning and implementation of interactive STEaM-based exhibits; groundbreaking educational programs delivered to 47 counties throughout the state, 47 states across the country, and numerous countries around the world; and an exceptional ability to establish and maintain strong collaborative bonds with public and private organizations from a variety of disciplines.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-collection-trust.jpeg
Royal Collection Trust
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ann-arbor-hands-on-museum.jpeg
Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Collection Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Collection Trust in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Royal Collection Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Collection Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-collection-trust.jpeg
Royal Collection Trust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ann-arbor-hands-on-museum.jpeg
Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Collection Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal Collection Trust company.

In the current year, Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company and Royal Collection Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company nor Royal Collection Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company nor Royal Collection Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company nor Royal Collection Trust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Collection Trust company nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Royal Collection Trust company nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Collection Trust company employs more people globally than Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Collection Trust nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References