Comparison Overview

Royal BAM Group

VS

Bechtel Corporation

Royal BAM Group

Runnenburg 9, Bunnik, undefined, 3981 AZ, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

🏗️ Building a Sustainable Tomorrow at BAM! As leaders in the construction industry, we are committed to pioneering sustainable practices that not only enhance our projects but also contribute to a better future for generations to come. Our strategy revolves around focusing to protect profitability, transforming to strengthen competitive advantage, and expanding for future growth. Join us in making possible by prioritising sustainability in everything we do. 🌍

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15,131
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bechtel Corporation

undefined, Reston, Virginia, 20190, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Bechtel is a trusted engineering, construction and project management partner to industry and government. Differentiated by the quality of our people and our relentless drive to deliver the most successful outcomes, we align our capabilities to our customers’ objectives to create a lasting positive impact. Since 1898, we have helped customers complete more than 25,000 projects in 160 countries on all seven continents that have created jobs, grown economies, improved the resiliency of the world's infrastructure, increased access to energy, resources, and vital services, and made the world a safer, cleaner place. Bechtel serves the Energy; Infrastructure; Manufacturing & Technology; Mining & Metals; and Nuclear, Security & Environmental markets. Our services span from initial planning and investment, through start-up and operations. Bechtel has received reports about individuals receiving fraudulent job confirmations and requests for interviews, offers, or solicitations for training via letters, emails, social postings, phone calls, instant messages (including Whatsapp) and texts. If you receive unsolicited job or interview offers or are unsure if the offer you received is fraudulent, contact Bechtel at [email protected]. Please forward the email, phone number, and any other documentation you received.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 25,856
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-bam-group.jpeg
Royal BAM Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bechtel-corporation.jpeg
Bechtel Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal BAM Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bechtel Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal BAM Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bechtel Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Royal BAM Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal BAM Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bechtel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bechtel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-bam-group.jpeg
Royal BAM Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bechtel-corporation.jpeg
Bechtel Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bechtel Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Royal BAM Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bechtel Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal BAM Group company.

In the current year, Bechtel Corporation company and Royal BAM Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bechtel Corporation company nor Royal BAM Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bechtel Corporation company nor Royal BAM Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bechtel Corporation company nor Royal BAM Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal BAM Group company nor Bechtel Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Royal BAM Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bechtel Corporation company.

Bechtel Corporation company employs more people globally than Royal BAM Group company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bechtel Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N