Comparison Overview

Royal Armouries Museum

VS

Artis—Naples

Royal Armouries Museum

Armouries Drive, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS10 1LT, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.royalarmouries.org/visit-us/leeds

The Royal Armouries is the United Kingdom’s national museum of arms and armour, and one of the most important museums of its type in the world. We have a long history, dating back to the Middle Ages. Our celebrated core collection originated in the nation’s working arsenal, which was assembled over many centuries at the Tower of London. The Royal Armouries are heir to one of the oldest deliberately created visitor attractions in the country. Objects were being arranged for display to visitors as early as Queen Elizabeth’s reign in the 16th century. Our collection of about 75,000 items – excluding approximately 2,700 loans to other bodies – is now displayed and housed in our historical home at the White Tower in the Tower of London but also at our purpose-built museum in Leeds, and at Fort Nelson near Portsmouth.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 168
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Artis—Naples

Naples, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://artisnaples.org

Enlightening, engaging and entertaining, Artis—Naples is the premier center for the performing and visual arts in Southwest Florida. Encompassing the Naples Philharmonic, Baker Museum and a multidisciplinary presenting program, Artis—Naples produces more than 300 concerts, stage shows, exhibitions and educational events for children and adults each year. Serving the diverse community of Naples, Florida, Artis—Naples is a vital and inspirational resource for all. Artis—Naples has 445 full- and part-time employees, including a full-time administrative staff of 80, as well as several hundred volunteers. Our board of directors comes from a variety of business and professional backgrounds.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-armouries-museum.jpeg
Royal Armouries Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artisnaples.jpeg
Artis—Naples
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal Armouries Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Artis—Naples
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Armouries Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Artis—Naples in 2026.

Incident History — Royal Armouries Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Armouries Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Artis—Naples (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Artis—Naples cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-armouries-museum.jpeg
Royal Armouries Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artisnaples.jpeg
Artis—Naples
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Royal Armouries Museum company and Artis—Naples company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Artis—Naples company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Royal Armouries Museum company.

In the current year, Artis—Naples company and Royal Armouries Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Artis—Naples company nor Royal Armouries Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Artis—Naples company nor Royal Armouries Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Artis—Naples company nor Royal Armouries Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum company nor Artis—Naples company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum nor Artis—Naples holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum company nor Artis—Naples company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Armouries Museum company employs more people globally than Artis—Naples company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum nor Artis—Naples holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum nor Artis—Naples holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum nor Artis—Naples holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum nor Artis—Naples holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum nor Artis—Naples holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum nor Artis—Naples holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References