Comparison Overview

Rover.com

VS

Rentokil Terminix

Rover.com

720 Olive Way, Seattle, Washington, US, 98101
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rover.com

At Rover, everyone has ownership of their work and the opportunity to make a true impact. We believe that being diverse and inclusive is key to our success and encourage every employee to share their unique perspective while being their true self. We believe everyone deserves the unconditional love of a pet, and Rover exists to make it easier to experience that love. We’re supporting dog owners and empowering dog sitters to run thriving pet-care businesses in your neighborhoods. The Rover app and website connect dog and cat parents with loving pet sitters and dog walkers in neighborhoods across the US, Canada, and Europe.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 11,132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rentokil Terminix

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.enhancedpestcontrol.com/

The Rentokil and Terminix family of brands have come together to form the world’s leading pest control company. With our shared vision, we’ll be expanding our products, services, and technology. And with our combined resources, we’ll do more to power innovation and develop sustainable solutions for our planet. It’s all part of our commitment to putting you first and delivering the highest level of comfort and peace of mind to families, businesses and local communities around the corner and around the globe. This page is intended for corporate updates. To see brand specific content, visit our affiliated pages.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 12,740
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roverdotcom.jpeg
Rover.com
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rentokilterminix.jpeg
Rentokil Terminix
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rover.com
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rentokil Terminix
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rover.com in 2026.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rentokil Terminix in 2026.

Incident History — Rover.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rover.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rentokil Terminix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rentokil Terminix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roverdotcom.jpeg
Rover.com
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rentokilterminix.jpeg
Rentokil Terminix
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Rover.com company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rentokil Terminix company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rentokil Terminix company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rover.com company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rentokil Terminix company and Rover.com company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rentokil Terminix company nor Rover.com company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Rentokil Terminix company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Rover.com company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rentokil Terminix company nor Rover.com company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rover.com company nor Rentokil Terminix company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rover.com nor Rentokil Terminix holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rover.com company nor Rentokil Terminix company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rentokil Terminix company employs more people globally than Rover.com company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither Rover.com nor Rentokil Terminix holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rover.com nor Rentokil Terminix holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rover.com nor Rentokil Terminix holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rover.com nor Rentokil Terminix holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rover.com nor Rentokil Terminix holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rover.com nor Rentokil Terminix holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References