Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V.METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V.
VS
SoneparSonepar
METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V.

METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V.

Schieweg 104, Delft, 2627AR, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

Metro Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office BV (RTO) located in Delft, The Netherlands is part of the METRO GROUP. METRO is a leading international food wholesaler which specialises in serving the needs of hotels, restaurants, and caterers (HoReCa) as well as inde...

NAICS:42
NAICS Definition:Wholesale Trade
Employees:44
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sonepar

Sonepar

25 rue d’Astorg, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sonepar.com
774/1000Fair

Sonepar is an independent family-owned company standing as the world leader in B-to-B distribution of electrical equipment, solutions, and services. In 2024, Sonepar achieved sales of €32.5 billion. Present in 40 countries with a dense network of brands, the Group is le...

NAICS:42
NAICS Definition:Wholesale Trade
Employees:21,498
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V.

METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sonepar

Sonepar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sonepar in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sonepar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sonepar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V.

METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sonepar

Sonepar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. company and Sonepar company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. and Sonepar, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. and Sonepar, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. or Sonepar ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. or Sonepar ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. and Sonepar, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between METRO Food Sourcing - Rotterdam Trading Office B.V. and Sonepar, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1