Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rotman Commerce, University of TorontoRotman Commerce, University of Toronto
VS
The George Washington UniversityThe George Washington University
Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto

Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto

125 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2E8, CA

Last Update: 09/12/2025

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Rotman Commerce is the undergraduate business program at the University of Toronto's St. George campus, offered by the Faculty of Arts & Science and the Rotman School of Management.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:195
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The George Washington University

The George Washington University

2121 I Street, NW, Washington, D.C., US, 20052

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gwu.edu
799/1000Fair

The George Washington University, an independent academic institution chartered by the Congress of the United States in 1821, dedicates itself to furthering human well-being. The University values a dynamic, student-focused community stimulated by cultural and intellect...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,815
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto

Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The George Washington University

The George Washington University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The George Washington University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The George Washington University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The George Washington University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto

Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The George Washington University

The George Washington University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1777372097

FAQ

Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto company and The George Washington University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto and The George Washington University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto and The George Washington University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto or The George Washington University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto or The George Washington University ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto and The George Washington University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rotman Commerce, University of Toronto and The George Washington University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8