Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rosewood LondonRosewood London
VS
WhitbreadWhitbread
Rosewood London

Rosewood London

252 High Holborn, London, undefined, WC1V 7EN, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Rosewood London is a highly individual, residential-style luxury hotel offering a unique culture capturing the natural calling shared by its associates and their desire to build genuine, rewarding and lasting relationship with everyone they meet. Grand and gracious, R...

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:292
Subsidiaries:65
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Whitbread

Whitbread

Whitbread Court, Houghton Regis, Dunstable, LU5 5XE, GB

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Whitbread PLC is the owner of the UK’s favourite hotel chain, Premier Inn, as well as restaurant brands, Beefeater, Brewers Fayre, Table Table, Bar + Block and Cookhouse and Pub. Whitbread employs more than 35,000 people in more than 1,200 Premier Inn hotels and restau...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:13,668
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rosewood London

Rosewood London

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Whitbread

Whitbread

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rosewood London in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whitbread in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rosewood London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rosewood London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Whitbread (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whitbread cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rosewood London

Rosewood London

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Whitbread

Whitbread

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rosewood London company and Whitbread company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rosewood London and Whitbread, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rosewood London and Whitbread, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rosewood London or Whitbread ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rosewood London or Whitbread ?
Between Rosewood London and Whitbread, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rosewood London and Whitbread, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-14683
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in HdrHistogram up to 2.2.2. Affected by this issue is the function org.HdrHistogram.AbstractHistogram.decodeFromCompressedByteBuffer of the file src/main/java/org/HdrHistogram/AbstractHistogram.java. The manipulation of the argument lengthOfCompressedContents results in uncontrolled memory allocation. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 1.7
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-14660
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in code-projects Online Job Portal 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file login.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument txtUser/txtPass results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-14659
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /patientappointment.php. Such manipulation of the argument patiente leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14658
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in code-projects Assessment Management 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /lecturer/marking-scheme.php. The manipulation of the argument smarksrange[] results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14657
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in code-projects Assessment Management 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /lecturer/marking-scheme.php of the component Database Query Handler. This manipulation of the argument squestions[] causes sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8