Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Romanian Energy Center (CRE)Romanian Energy Center (CRE)
VS
NOVNOV
Romanian Energy Center (CRE)

Romanian Energy Center (CRE)

Bulevardul Mircea Eliade 2, Sectorul 1, 012013, RO

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.crenerg.org/
637/1000Poor

The Romanian Energy Center (CRE) is a non-profit, non-governmental organization with its main objective to promote the active participation of Romanian state-owned and private companies in the Energy Market towards European partnerships, in European co-financed projects...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
NOV

NOV

10353 Richmond Ave, Houston, Texas, US, 77042

Last Update: 19/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nov.com
795/1000Fair

NOV delivers technology-driven solutions to empower the global energy industry. For more than 150 years, NOV has pioneered innovations that enable its customers to safely produce abundant energy while minimizing environmental impact. The energy industry depends on NOV’s...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:37,742
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Romanian Energy Center (CRE)

Romanian Energy Center (CRE)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NOV

NOV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

Romanian Energy Center (CRE) has 55.16% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NOV in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Romanian Energy Center (CRE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Romanian Energy Center (CRE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NOV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NOV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Romanian Energy Center (CRE)

Romanian Energy Center (CRE)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CONROMSOC1770309414
NOV

NOV

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) company and NOV company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) and NOV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) and NOV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Romanian Energy Center (CRE) or NOV ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Romanian Energy Center (CRE) or NOV ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) and NOV, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Romanian Energy Center (CRE) and NOV, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8