Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rochester Philharmonic OrchestraRochester Philharmonic Orchestra
VS
Yamaha CorporationYamaha Corporation
Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra

Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra

255 East Avenue , Suite LL02, Rochester, NY, US, 14604

Last Update: 29/05/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.rpo.org
610/1000Poor

Since its founding by George Eastman in 1922, the RPO has been committed to enriching and inspiring our community through the art of music. Currently in its 100th year, the RPO is dedicated to maintaining its high standard of artistic excellence, unique tradition of mus...

NAICS:71113
NAICS Definition:Musical Groups and Artists
Employees:129
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Yamaha Corporation

Yamaha Corporation

10-1 Nakazawacho, Naka Ward, , Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, JP, 430-0904

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.yamaha.com/
786/1000Fair

Our history began in 1887 when Yamaha founder Torakusu Yamaha completed a repair job on a reed organ at a Japanese primary school. Perhaps no one thought at the time that this event would mark the beginning of 130-plus year history during which Yamaha would become a wor...

NAICS:71113
NAICS Definition:Musical Groups and Artists
Employees:12,590
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra

Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Yamaha Corporation

Yamaha Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Musicians Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Musicians Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yamaha Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Yamaha Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yamaha Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra

Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ROC1764813866
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ROC1780072449
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ROC1764734244
Yamaha Corporation

Yamaha Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra and Yamaha Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra and Yamaha Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra or Yamaha Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra or Yamaha Corporation ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra and Yamaha Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra and Yamaha Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA