Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rockrose Development Corp.Rockrose Development Corp.
VS
SM SupermallsSM Supermalls
Rockrose Development Corp.

Rockrose Development Corp.

15 East 26th Street, New York, 10010, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.rockrose.com/
674/1000Weak

HISTORY Rockrose Development Corp. is a premier NYC owner-builder-manager with a name for architectural excellence, sensitivity to neighborhoods, vision for "creating community"​, and reputation for carefully managing our projects. Founded in 1970 by three brothers,...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:186
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City, 1300, PH

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
784/1000Fair

The SM Group of companies stands today as an institution, a store, a mall, a bank, a home, a resort, a hotel, and a place to see and experience with the family. One of the core business areas of the SM Group is the Shopping Center Management Corporation, generally ref...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13,749
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rockrose Development Corp.

Rockrose Development Corp.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rockrose Development Corp. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SM Supermalls in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rockrose Development Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rockrose Development Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SM Supermalls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SM Supermalls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rockrose Development Corp.

Rockrose Development Corp.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ROC1765570310
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. and SM Supermalls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. and SM Supermalls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rockrose Development Corp. or SM Supermalls ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rockrose Development Corp. or SM Supermalls ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. and SM Supermalls, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rockrose Development Corp. and SM Supermalls, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8