Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RockerboxRockerbox
VS
SwisscomSwisscom
Rockerbox

Rockerbox

17250 Dallas Pkwy, Dallas, 75248, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.rockerbox.tech
669/1000Weak

Rockerbox. Mining Profitability. Our mission is to provide every small business owner with an opportunity to participate in various employer-based tax credit programs. Programs like WOTC, ERTC, EZ, R&D and Cost Segregation can dramatically improve cash flow - upt to...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Swisscom

Swisscom

Alte Tiefenaustrasse 6, Worblaufen, 3048, CH

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.swisscom.ch/
757/1000Fair

As No. 1, we inspire people in the connected world. With the latest technologies and innovations, together we have the opportunity to shape the future. To do this, we are and act trustworthy, committed and curious. Are you with us? Join us on this exciting journey and ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:15,556
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rockerbox

Rockerbox

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swisscom

Swisscom

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rockerbox in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Swisscom has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Rockerbox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rockerbox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swisscom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swisscom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rockerbox

Rockerbox

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROC540070925
Swisscom

Swisscom

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SWI1786128838
🔒 Incident : Breach
SWI11477622

FAQ

Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rockerbox company and Swisscom company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rockerbox and Swisscom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rockerbox and Swisscom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rockerbox or Swisscom ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rockerbox or Swisscom ?
Between Rockerbox and Swisscom, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rockerbox and Swisscom, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3