Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

"Rock-IT” recruiting agency"Rock-IT” recruiting agency
VS
Aya HealthcareAya Healthcare
"Rock-IT” recruiting agency

"Rock-IT” recruiting agency

Kiev, None, Kiev, Kiev, UA, 10100

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://rock-it.tilda.ws/
719/1000Moderate

Rock-IT is a Ukrainian company that works in IT staff recruitment for international IT companies. Our team of experts has extensive experience in the industry and a deep understanding of the Information Technology landscape, allowing us to help companies save costs, red...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:142
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Aya Healthcare

Aya Healthcare

5930 Cornerstone Ct #300, San Diego, 92121, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
736/1000Moderate

Aya Healthcare is the largest healthcare talent software and staffing company in the United States. Aya operates the world’s largest digital staffing platform delivering every component of healthcare-focused labor services, including travel nursing and allied health, pe...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:23,579
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
"Rock-IT” recruiting agency

"Rock-IT” recruiting agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aya Healthcare

Aya Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for "Rock-IT” recruiting agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aya Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - "Rock-IT” recruiting agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

"Rock-IT” recruiting agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aya Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aya Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
"Rock-IT” recruiting agency

"Rock-IT” recruiting agency

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROC110072625
Aya Healthcare

Aya Healthcare

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AYA818080425

FAQ

Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency company and Aya Healthcare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency and Aya Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency and Aya Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - "Rock-IT” recruiting agency or Aya Healthcare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - "Rock-IT” recruiting agency or Aya Healthcare ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency and Aya Healthcare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between "Rock-IT” recruiting agency and Aya Healthcare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8