Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Roche Belgium & LuxembourgRoche Belgium & Luxembourg
VS
Ramsay Health CareRamsay Health Care
Roche Belgium & Luxembourg

Roche Belgium & Luxembourg

Rue Dante 75, Anderlecht, 1070, BE

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.roche.be
761/1000Fair

Welcome to Roche Belgium and Luxembourg! Everything we do starts with three beliefs: science must listen, innovation must connect, and care must include. We are Roche Belgium & Luxembourg — where diagnostics and medicines come together to better serve people. We work ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:132
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ramsay Health Care

Ramsay Health Care

Sydney, AU

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ramsayhealth.com
743/1000Moderate

Ramsay Health Care is a trusted provider of private hospital and healthcare services in Australia, Europe and the United Kingdom. Every year, millions of patients put their trust in Ramsay, confident in our ability to deliver safe, high-quality healthcare with outstan...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,558
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Roche Belgium & Luxembourg

Roche Belgium & Luxembourg

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ramsay Health Care

Ramsay Health Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roche Belgium & Luxembourg in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ramsay Health Care in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Roche Belgium & Luxembourg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roche Belgium & Luxembourg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ramsay Health Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ramsay Health Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Roche Belgium & Luxembourg

Roche Belgium & Luxembourg

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ramsay Health Care

Ramsay Health Care

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RAM355071125

FAQ

Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg company and Ramsay Health Care company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg and Ramsay Health Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg and Ramsay Health Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Roche Belgium & Luxembourg or Ramsay Health Care ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Roche Belgium & Luxembourg or Ramsay Health Care ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg and Ramsay Health Care, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Roche Belgium & Luxembourg and Ramsay Health Care, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9