Comparison Overview
Roboverse Reply DE

Roboverse Reply DE
Bartholomäusweg 26, Gütersloh, 33334, DE
Last Update: 20/12/2025
Roboverse Reply specializes in the integration around robotics, AI and the Industrial Metaverse. Roboverse works with several robotics, hardware and software vendors, including Boston Dynamics and Microsoft. For clients, Roboverse Reply is both the holistic partner for ...

Expleo Group
3 avenue des Prés, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Ile-de-France, FR, 78180
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Expleo is a global engineering, technology and consulting service provider that partners with leading organisations to guide them through their business transformation, helping them achieve operational excellence and future-proof their businesses. Expleo benefits fro...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Roboverse Reply DE







Expleo Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Roboverse Reply DE in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Expleo Group in 2026.
Incident History - Roboverse Reply DE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Roboverse Reply DE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Expleo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Expleo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Roboverse Reply DE

Expleo Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.