Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MIT xPRO | Robotics EssentialsMIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials
VS
University of TehranUniversity of Tehran
MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials

MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials

undefined, Cambridge, undefined, undefined, US

Last Update: 29/10/2025

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Converging technologies and global competition are fueling the rapid growth of robotics development in various industries. Organizations today require individuals with the appropriate blend of technical and business expertise to take advantage of the significant potenti...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Tehran

University of Tehran

16 Azar Street, Enghlab Avenue, Tehran, 1417466191, IR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ut.ac.ir/
798/1000Fair

University of Tehran, an iconic institution of higher education in Iran, traces its origins back seven centuries to its foundation as a houza (traditional religious school). Over time, it evolved from this religious structure into a modern academic institution. About a ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,412
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials

MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Tehran

University of Tehran

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Tehran in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Tehran (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Tehran cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials

MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Tehran

University of Tehran

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials company and University of Tehran company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials and University of Tehran, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials and University of Tehran, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials or University of Tehran ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials or University of Tehran ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials and University of Tehran, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MIT xPRO | Robotics Essentials and University of Tehran, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3