Comparison Overview
Robinson Club GmbH

Robinson Club GmbH
Hannover, 30625, DE
Last Update: 05/01/2026
Robinson Club GmbH is the company headquarters of the two club brands, TUI MAGIC LIFE and ROBINSON operating as part of TUI AG. With our 16 TUI MAGIC LIFE Clubs and 26 ROBINSON Clubs worldwide, we stand for contemporary, multifaceted club holidays that provide our ...

Aramark
2400 Market St, Philadelphia, 19103, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) proudly serves the world’s leading educational institutions, Fortune 500 companies, world champion sports teams, prominent healthcare providers, iconic destinations and cultural attractions, and numerous municipalities in 16 countries around the wor...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Robinson Club GmbH







Aramark






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Robinson Club GmbH in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aramark in 2026.
Incident History - Robinson Club GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Robinson Club GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aramark (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aramark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Robinson Club GmbH

Aramark
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.