Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Roanoke Insurance Group Inc.Roanoke Insurance Group Inc.
VS
Allianz PartnersAllianz Partners
Roanoke Insurance Group Inc.

Roanoke Insurance Group Inc.

1501 E. Woodfield Rd., Schaumburg, IL, 60173, US

Last Update: 17/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.roanokegroup.com
752/1000Fair

Roanoke Insurance Group Inc., a Munich Re company, is a specialty insurance broker focused on surety bond and insurance solutions for logistics service providers, customs brokers and companies managing supply chains. Founded in 1935, Roanoke was the first provider of cu...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:219
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Allianz Partners

Allianz Partners

Eurosquare 2, Saint-Ouen, 93400, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Allianz Partners is a world leader in B2B2C insurance and assistance, offering global solutions that span international health and life, travel insurance, automotive and assistance. Customer driven, our innovative experts are redefining insurance services by delivering ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:12,294
Subsidiaries:107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Roanoke Insurance Group Inc.

Roanoke Insurance Group Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Allianz Partners

Allianz Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Allianz Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Roanoke Insurance Group Inc.

Roanoke Insurance Group Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Allianz Partners

Allianz Partners

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. company and Allianz Partners company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. and Allianz Partners, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. and Allianz Partners, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. or Allianz Partners ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. or Allianz Partners ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. and Allianz Partners, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Roanoke Insurance Group Inc. and Allianz Partners, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2