Comparison Overview
RMIT College of Business and Law
RMIT College of Business and Law
Melbourne , 3138, AU
Last Update: 30/12/2025
RMIT’s College of Business and Law is uniquely positioned at the intersection of business and technology with social impact and proudly delivers world-class programs and research that meet the evolving needs of students and industry. We take an industry and student-ce...
University of Florida
355 Tigert Hall, Gainesville, Florida, US, 32611-3115
Last Update: 29/03/2026
University of Florida is a major, public, comprehensive, land-grant, research university. The state's oldest, largest and most comprehensive university, it is among the nation's most academically diverse public universities. University of Florida has a long history of e...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
RMIT College of Business and Law
University of Florida
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for RMIT College of Business and Law in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Florida in 2026.
Incident History - RMIT College of Business and Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RMIT College of Business and Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
RMIT College of Business and Law
University of Florida
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.