Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™)Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™)
VS
Mary Kay GlobalMary Kay Global
Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™)

Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™)

Stadtwaldgürtel 42, Köln, 50931, DE

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Rituals Cosmetics ist eine Marke, die sich für nachhaltiges und persönliches Wohlbefinden in der Luxuskosmetikbranche einsetzt. Als einer der führenden Begründer der Integration von Bad-, Home- und Körperpflege in einem einzigen Portfolio, verkörpern wir den Lebensstil,...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:472
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mary Kay Global

Mary Kay Global

16251 Dallas Parkway, Addison, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

About Mary Kay - Then. Now. Always. One of the original glass ceiling breakers, Mary Kay Ash founded her dream beauty brand in Texas in 1963 with one goal: to enrich women’s lives. That dream has blossomed into a global company with unlimited opportunities to do somethi...

NAICS:32562
NAICS Definition:Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees:50,085
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™)

Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mary Kay Global

Mary Kay Global

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mary Kay Global in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mary Kay Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mary Kay Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™)

Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mary Kay Global

Mary Kay Global

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) company and Mary Kay Global company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) and Mary Kay Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) and Mary Kay Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) or Mary Kay Global ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) or Mary Kay Global ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) and Mary Kay Global, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rituals Cosmetics DACH (B Corp™) and Mary Kay Global, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA